(Electric Chair listed at $4500: See the rest of the pics below...)
It seems like there is almost a movement of artists "appropriating" the Louis Vuitton logo in their work.
The thing is that IMO LVMH has two problems with the Darfur shirt:
- Who the heck wants to be connected to Darfur? LVMH, I'm sure doesn't want any association with the atrocites going on over there.
- The bag that she's pictured on her shirt is a fake: "confusingly similar" to a Louis Vuitton Murakami Multicolore. From the Cease and Desist letter that LVMH send Nadia Plesner:
“Although we applaud your efforts to raise awareness and funds to help Darfur, a most worthy cause, we cannot help noticing that the design of the Simple Living Products includes the reproduction of a bag infringing on Louis Vuitton’s Intellectual Property Rights, in particular the Louis Vuitton Monogram Multicolore Trademark to which it is confusingly similar. We are surprised of such a promotion of a counterfeit bag.”
(Notice the Canal Street bracelets as cuffs)
So- now we've got Peter Gronquist's blinged out, urban warfare gone Canal Street. I can't imagine that Louis Vuitton would be pleased.
(Chain Saw sold for $3250)
Gronquiest's exhibition, "The Revolution will be Fabulous- A Weapons of Mass Designer Show" opened Friday night at Gallery 1988 in Los Angeles. This is I guess a commentary on not only commercialism, but the luxurization of everything. (Think Prada Phone, Chanel or Gucci Bicycle, Louis Vuitton Teddy Bear.)
He didn't leave anyone out.... you'll find rifles, artillery shells, granades, glocks, machine guns and for whatever reason- a Gazelle decked out in Louis Vuitton, Hermes, Chanel, Gucci, Fendi, Coach, Prada, Versace, Dior, D&G and Burberry.
(listed at $3500)
(Notice the tell-tale striping)
Gronquist used counterfeit scarves to cover these items, as is clear from the close-ups. (Louis Vuitton never made scarves with that striped effect, but they're common in fakes.)
(Again with the striped scarf- this one sold for $3500)
(Artillery Shell- this one sold for $800)
(Blinged out Multicolore Murakami)
(No comment on the LV antlered Gazelle)
Hmmm, wonder if Louis Vuitton's gonna send Gronquist the same love letter that they sent Nadia?
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!Tags: Appropriation, art, Darfur, Gallery 1988, Gazelle, Glock, Gun, Louis Vuitton, Nadia Plesner, Peter Gronquist, Richard Prince, Rifle
Gay Hitmen everywhere will be pleased. I am on the fence about using the LV logo in art. As an illustrator, sometimes using a well known figure, logo or person will bring more attention or make more of an impact to your art work, so that I understand. That being said, I would probably be angry if someone took one of my creations and used them as statements against society. The gazelle I don’t get at all???
The horns = LV logo, right? That’s what I got out of it, Fred. Generally, I think these “artistic statements” have cheap shock value and are mildly entertaining in some cases.
Hey – sorry for 2nd negative comment in a row! I’ll try for positive outlook next time!
I saw the horns in the LV logo, I just don’t get the statement..I agree with you on the shock value of it.
Yeah… I’m with both of you. It’s easy money as the saying goes.
The Gazelle makes no sense. It goes with “the luxurization of everything” statement, but doesn’t make any sense with “The Revolution will be Fabulous- A Weapons of Mass Designer Show” weapon theme at all.
Sarah
[...] similar the “new” Justin Melnick “ARM ME” exhibition is in comparison with Peter Gronquiest’s The Revolution will be Fabulous- A Weapons of Mass Designer Show in LA just a couple months ago. I [...]
[...] the whole, use the logo on a bullet or gun to make a political statement. It’s been done OVER and [...]
[...] the… same… thing. You know, take something violent and offensive like an electric chair or a bullet or a creepy looking dog… and wrap it all up in Louis Vuitton monogram, or [...]