<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Appropriation, Commercialization, Collaboration, Litigation</title>
	<link>http://www.fashionphile.com/blog/richard-prince/appropriation-commercialization-collaboration-litigation/</link>
	<description>For Louis Vuitton Fans, Bag Lovers and Fashionphiles like us!</description>
	<pubDate>Fri,  9 Jan 2009 15:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ' + wtitle + '</title>
		<link>http://www.fashionphile.com/blog/richard-prince/appropriation-commercialization-collaboration-litigation/#comment-2627</link>
		<dc:creator>' + wtitle + '</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 18:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fashionphile.com/blog/richard-prince/appropriation-commercialization-collaboration-litigation/#comment-2627</guid>
		<description>[...] Anyway&#8230; I mean, I get it.  A game of fakes and they&#8217;re using the logos of the most historically faked brand satirically.  But that&#8217;s just the problem.   Louis Vuitton doesn&#8217;t want to be associated with anything counterfeit&#8230; let alone a game of fakes.  (And quite frankly, they are vigilant in quashing the unauthorized use of their marks at all.  Remember Britney, Ruben Studdard, Da Brat, BMG and the infamous Darfur shirt?) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Anyway&#8230; I mean, I get it.  A game of fakes and they&#8217;re using the logos of the most historically faked brand satirically.  But that&#8217;s just the problem.   Louis Vuitton doesn&#8217;t want to be associated with anything counterfeit&#8230; let alone a game of fakes.  (And quite frankly, they are vigilant in quashing the unauthorized use of their marks at all.  Remember Britney, Ruben Studdard, Da Brat, BMG and the infamous Darfur shirt?) [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ' + wtitle + '</title>
		<link>http://www.fashionphile.com/blog/richard-prince/appropriation-commercialization-collaboration-litigation/#comment-2141</link>
		<dc:creator>' + wtitle + '</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 12:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fashionphile.com/blog/richard-prince/appropriation-commercialization-collaboration-litigation/#comment-2141</guid>
		<description>[...] are powerful and get noticed.  But it&#8217;s just lazy.  It&#8217;s been done to death.  (Think Nadia Plesner&#8217;s Darfur shirt, Wim Delvoye&#8217;s LV tatoo&#8217;d pigs, Peter Gronquist&#8217;s monogram Electric Chair (and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] are powerful and get noticed.  But it&#8217;s just lazy.  It&#8217;s been done to death.  (Think Nadia Plesner&#8217;s Darfur shirt, Wim Delvoye&#8217;s LV tatoo&#8217;d pigs, Peter Gronquist&#8217;s monogram Electric Chair (and [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ' + wtitle + '</title>
		<link>http://www.fashionphile.com/blog/richard-prince/appropriation-commercialization-collaboration-litigation/#comment-688</link>
		<dc:creator>' + wtitle + '</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 09:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.fashionphile.com/blog/richard-prince/appropriation-commercialization-collaboration-litigation/#comment-688</guid>
		<description>[...] seems like there is almost a movement of artists &#8220;appropriating&#8221; the Louis Vuitton logo in their [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] seems like there is almost a movement of artists &#8220;appropriating&#8221; the Louis Vuitton logo in their [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
