Browse our Items on

View in-Store Items

Posts Tagged ‘eBay’

How to buy authentic luxury bags on eBay.

Tuesday, July 15th, 2008

With facing lawsuits from , , Tiffany & Company etc. and having them come up on both sides of the win-lose column, I thought I should write a little mini guide to help my blog readers who are looking to buy luxury goods on .

They are there.  Yes, you can find amazing, pre-owned and brand new , Chanel, , Gucci, Marc Jacobs, Coach (who else do you love? yep, them too…).  You know, we’d prefer it if you bought all of your bags from us :)  But it’s equally important to us that the bags you get elsewhere are at least .  So here are a few basic hints to keep you safe from and fraud:

1.  Buy from trustworthy sellers.  What kind of feedback does the seller have?  Don’t just look at numbers.  They may have just bought a bunch of junk to pump up their feedback score… Actually read responses.  What have they sold and bought in the past?  How long have they been selling?

2.  Get to know your .  Go to your local boutique and “try the on”.  Take note of the details.  If you’re looking fro , check our Photophile, for good, clear pictures of bags for comparison.   You can also search for similar items sold by reputable sellers.  They say, “the devil’s in the details” and this is so true with the “better” .

Check online for a good for the brand or line that you are interested in.  Study our free Louis Vuitton buying guides.   (They have all kinds of interesting information on release dates and colors, etc.  ie:  If White Epi wasn’t released until 2007, a white with a 2002 date code must be .)  You’d be surprised how many good guides are available on eBay’s Reviews and Guides.

3.  Are there good clear pictures?  If there aren’t enough pictures- ask for them.  If  you don’t get them, move on.  You’ll need a picture of the interior, some hardware, the embossing and any special markings (date code, registration number, creed etc)  You can’t make an informed decision on whether or not a is based on one or two pictures.

4.  Watch out for flag wording.  Get out quick if you see words like “final sale”, “got this from rich neighbor, aunt, collegue, etc- she’s a doctor’s wife” (for whatever reason, these are never real :), “it’s real- don’t ask”, “this was a gift, but it looks real”,  etc.

5.  Communicate with your buyer.  This is an expensive purchase that you are making.  Go ahead, ask questions.  Pay attention to the content and tone of the emails that you get in response.  In fact, if you are buying an expensive , and would feel more comfortable talking to the seller- ask if you can give her/him a call.  We get calls from potential buyers all the time.  We recognize that it makes people feel more comfortable to talk to us ear to ear.

6.  Make sure they take refunds for authenticity.  Even if the buyer has a hard core no refunds policy for condition, etc. if there is no refund available for authenticity… just don’t chance it.  This goes for sellers who say, “I know this is real, so I won’t take a refund for authenticity.”

7. Don’t be afraid to get it authenticated.  There are all types of paid services, from My Poupette to Carol Diva- and the experts on The Purse Forum and eBay’s Purse Board will actually authenticate for free!

8.  Is the price, “too good to be true?”  It probably is.  You just won’t find a Neverfull Gm in great condition for $250 Buy it Now.  Be careful about this.  Sure, there are bargains to be found- but these are relative bargains.  Like finding that Neverfull for $550 BIN.  You just aren’t going to find great condition, , luxury bags for 25% retail.

9. Pay by Credit Card-  Preferably buy ,  but at the very least… only pay with a credit card.  You will have the Credit Card behind you if you get in an authenticity dispute with your seller.  If you pay by , you have an additional level of security.  Even if their buyer protection is weak, it freaks out sellers when you file a claim.

And finally, number 10.  Buy from FASHIONPHILE!   Honestly- we take the worry out.  If there are ever any issues at all- we’ll work them out.  We do our best to make sure that you have a great experience with us.  If you don’t for whatever reason, let us know.  We’ll make it right.  So go ahead, and check our current weekly eBay auctions and all the fabulous items on our www.fashionphile.com website!

Good luck in finding the you’ve been searching for at a great price!

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

eBay wins against the Big Blue Box

Monday, July 14th, 2008

 Tiffany & Co girls
(Photo Credit: AP Photo- Richard Drew)
Well, this is fantastic news for us here at FASHIONPHILE- and for others who are just trying to run an honest business on selling luxury brands.  And, hey- chalk one up for the literally thousands of individual- honest sellers of legitimate luxury goods, who just want the ability to post their goods on .

I am always worried when rights owners use trademark arguments to keep such tight reign on their brand distribution that legitimate resale of goods is limited.  This is what happened in with the LVMH v , resulting in all LVMH perfumes being banned from the site.  And this is what worried me the most about the Tiffany & co. case.No honest seller wants any counterfeits available on .  It hurts all of us.  Even though we only sell luxury bags- when the reputation of is damaged in such a way, that potential buyers associate online sales with only - we lose and loses and the potential buyer loses the opportunity  to purchase an item at a discount.

At this point- at least with highly counterfeited brands like , Tiffany & Co, Chanel, etc. has taken specific measures to keep the off.  They do what a gatekeeper can do- make sure that seller’s are legitimate, that they are who they say they are, eliminate one day auctions, deal with second chance offer fraud, etc.   They’ve made great strides since early 2006- and the results are amazing.  The only way to “finish the job” and truly clean up the marketplace is to have rights owners get more involved.

Judge Richard Sullivan said regarding the Tiffany & Co. case…

“Tiffany has failed to demonstrate that knowingly encouraged others to dilute Tiffany’s trademarks.  Rather, to the extent that may have possessed general knowledge of infringement and dilution by sellers on its Web site, did not possess knowledge or a reason to know of specific instances of trademark infringement or dilution as required under the law.”

If you want to read more about it…

New York Times

Reuters

Wall Street Journal

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Paris Court of Appeals Upholds Decision to Keep LV, Dior off eBay

Friday, July 11th, 2008

eBay Louis Vuitton logo

Un-be-freaking-leavable…

Like I’ve said before… is well within its rights to do what it needs to do to get the counterfeits out of here.  And even, to perhaps seek sanctions for past gross negligence… But this is going too far- big time.

Basically, today the Court of Appeals upheld a June 30 ruling that has ordered to stop allowing the listing of any , Parfums, and Parfums fragrances and cosmetics on .

’s is already appealing the original $63.2 million ruling on negligence in allowing counterfeits on the site… But they were trying to get an emergency injunctive order after a review of the part that forbid them from allowing sellers to list LVMH perfumes (that were sold outside of ’s regular, authorized distribution channels) on the site- or face the unreal DAILY fine of 50,000 euros, or $79,000.

So, the appeals court basically upheld the fine and in fact- upped the ante- ordering to pay an additional $15,736!

Wow.  I mean, what would it do to the value of any luxury good- if it no longer had resale value?   A lot of people buy cars, art, jewelry (and handbags) with their inherent resale value- and even, investment value in mind.    Unreal.

Again… I’m on the egde of my seat to find out what a US Court will say in a similar situation (Tiffany & Co. v. ).  Any day now…

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Hey CBS, need a hand?

Sunday, July 6th, 2008

 

Whenever I see these little video guides- I just think to myself, why didn’t they get someone on there who knows what they are talking about. This is Molly Wood for CNet- Spotting Designer Knockoffs Online. “How To Tell Phonies From The Real McCoy!“  CBS’s put it on their morning show.  It was in response to the $61 million v decision.  For example, here is the first hint on their website:

“…  bags have five stitches across the top, the snaps all say , the color is specific. What should the zipper look like? Look for lots of clear, detailed photos with the listings. “     

(Which is partly true…. SOME bags have only five stitches across the top of the leather tab– the traditional monogram Speedys for example.  This is NOT true of all bags.  Some vintage bags do NOT have on the hardware.  Yes, look at the zipper and make sure it’s the right style for that .  And I agree, make sure there are good, detailed pictures.)

Hey, at least it isn’t as bad as my favorite worst video guide of all time.  Check it out if you haven’t.  It’s HILARIOUS!!! 

And, Molly… if you need a hand with one of those videos- give me a ring! You know I’d be happy to help you out.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

eBay fights back…

Monday, June 30th, 2008

We knew they’d appeal… but here is ’s official media response (From the eBay Ink blog, read more here)

The bolded parts are particularly interesting to me…

Inc issued the following statement:
If Counterfeits appear on our sites we take them down swiftly, but today’s ruling is not about our fight against ; today’s ruling is about an attempt by LVMH to protect uncompetitive commercial practices at the expense of consumer choice and the livelihood of law-abiding sellers that empowers everyday.

We believe that this ruling represents a loss not only for us but for consumers and small businesses selling online, therefore we will appeal. It is clear that has become a focal point for certain brand owners’ desire to exact ever greater control over e-commerce. We view these decisions as a step backwards for the consumers and businesses whom we empower everyday.

We believe that the overreach manifests itself through an attempt to impose, in , a business model that restricts consumer choice through an anti-competitive business practice.

The ruling also seeks to impact the sale of second-hand goods as well as new genuine products, effectively reaching into homes and rolling back the clock on the Internet and liberty it has created. The attempt to use the ruling to confuse the separate issues of and restrictive sales suggests that suits are being used by certain brand owners as a stalking-horse issue to reinforce their control over the market.

does more and more to combat . We invest more than $20 million each year to ensure goods are found and removed. We partner with over 18,000 brand owners around the world to identify and successfully remove goods and employ over 2,000 people to carry out this fight on a daily basis. When we find goods on our sites we take it down.

Overzealous enforcement of restrictive sales practices are anti-competitive and give consumers a bad deal. This is recognised by European Union policy-makers who are seeking to create a better framework for online sales to promote e-commerce in Europe. We support a free and fair market in Europe and the benefits this will bring for our sellers.

will continue to fight against and continue to fight for consumer value through the promotion of e-commerce.

What do you think?

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Louis Vuitton wins against eBay Inc.

Monday, June 30th, 2008

eBay Louis Vuitton logo

Ouch… a Court ordered to pay $63 million in damages to for negligence in allowing the sales of on the website.  (Read more about it here…)

You have to hand it to .  They got the job done.  They single handedly lit a fire under the figurative backside of Inc, and got them to do what needed so much to be done… to clean up the marketplace.

The court decision makes so much sense to me… and obviously is appealing, but the situation on was SO bad for SO long… it’s not shocking that the courts would lay down a heavy hand.

Let’s face it.  has made a lot, and I mean a LOT of money on the sale of goods on their site.  (I’m estimating on average sells about 16,000 items a month at an average sales price of $375 with average start prices of $175.  That makes the average fee for items at about $17.  Multiply that times 192,000 items a year… and we’re looking at $3.8 million in fees annually for the LV brand alone.  LV’s claim of 90% on was probably about right until the big overhaul in fall 2006… so you do the math.)

I mean, we (putting myself with the collective community of online shoppers to whom authenticity absolutely essential) had been almost badgering for years and years to do something… and yet the situation on just literally got worse and worse. The countless , the one day auctions, the zero feedback seller with 50 NWT LV listings, the second chance offers, the $75 BINs for $1000 bags.  I mean, now we ask where all the buyers have gone?

They said that nothing more could be done- they were doing all they could, they’re just a venue, yada, yada, yada.  A few years ago, I could go through a whole page of listings on and literally not find a single .

That is not the situation now.  The vast majority of listings on today are .

So if was just a venue, and was doing all they could do… what happened?

Tiffany & Co and sued.  woke up.  They turned on the lights, swept the place out, cleaned the place up, batten down the hatches and locked the doors.

It was hard for all of us to adjust at first, but has taken the right first steps to improve the atmosphere and the trust level that we all needed in a platform to be able to sell luxury goods online.

now monitors closely brands that are frequently counterfeited.  There are restrictions on how long you have to be selling on the site to list those brands, and how many you can list at once.  There is particular wording watched for that gives flags that a listing may be fraudulent.  Brands that are watched don’t get listed immediatley, but go through and overview process for up to 10 hours before they hit the site.

has come a long way, baby!

So I’m fine with the damages awarded by the Parisian Court…

What is frightening part to me:

Part of that ruling includes payment of 3.25 million Euros to , , and for allowing perfume to be sold outside of the “authorized network”.

The result of this part of the decision is that is completely barred from listing these cosmetic and perfume brands on its site PERIOD.

’s “official response”:

“Today’s ruling is not about our fight against counterfeits; today’s ruling is about an attempt by LVMH to protect uncompetitive commercial practices at the expense of consumer choice and the livelihood of law-abiding sellers that empowers everyday,” said in an e-mailed statement. “We will fight this ruling on their behalf.”

Yipes?  So I get J’adore perfume for my birthday and never use it (which I did, and I don’t… it’s just not my favorite).  I now can’t list it on because I am not a member of the authorized distribution network for ?

Hmmm… got to get back to you when I look into this more.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Here it comes…

Sunday, June 29th, 2008

 Louis Vuitton eBay Logo

The v. decision that is.  It should be here on the 30th- tomorrow that is.

Are you ready?

After that amazing Candadian decision- $1 million for a fairly small store (with only a couple locations)… and the $30,000 eBay had to pay Hermes last month after a decision against them in a French court for allowing 3 (yes, three) on the site…  I’m DYING to hear what the French Courts are going to say in the against Inc.

, et al, is seeking 51 million Euro ($80 MILLION) in damages for negligence and the illicit sales of bags on their site.

(As an aside- as someone who’s been on since 1999, I will say that has done a pretty good job in the last couple years at getting, I’d estimate 95% LESS listed on the site than they did years ago…

There was a day when the vast, vast majority of the bags listed on the site were .  Now, the opposite is true.)

This is the part that scares me…

Part of the decision will answer perfume brands , , and who have an issue with even when they allow goods to be listed.  They claim that even this is illegal because these companies hold tight control on their distribution chains and ONLY permit specialist, authorized dealers to sell their goods.

I can’t wait…

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

eBay fined in Hermes Counterfeit Case

Wednesday, June 4th, 2008

Wow.  This could end up being costly to .

It looks like a French court found guilty of selling three handbags and ordered them (and the woman who listed the bags) to pay $30,000 dollars in damages to .  Not only that- but (and this is my favorite part of the ruling)… they are required to POST the ruling on the website for three months!!!

attorney’s went for it bigtime, and weren’t mincing words.  Attorney Emmanuel Colomes said of ,

“We are satisfied that they should be considered counterfeiters”

 And apparently, the court agreed.  The ruling said:

“By selling bags and branded accessories on the .fr site, and by failing to act within their powers to prevent reprehensible use of the site,” (the woman who listed the and ) “committed acts of counterfeiting and imitation of French brand names … to the detriment of international,”

Hmmm….  This just makes me think of the ongoing Tiffany & Company and v. cases.   Tiffany & Co. is a US case, I believe.  But, LV also filed in .  French courts are MUCH more protective of the rights owners and distribution rights etc. of players in the industry than we are here in the US.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Back from eBay’s Ecommerce!

Friday, February 1st, 2008

Sorry the lights were out here for a few days now! hosted it’s this week, and so, I was off to DC.

Wow. Tons of changes for all sellers out there. Very interesting. We’re definitely re-evaluating our strategy there… more info to come!

I have got to get this “blogging while you’re out of town” thing down better! My apologies!

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Name that Boutique! Louis Vuitton #1

Wednesday, December 12th, 2007

OK… I thought this might be a fun little game. I a lot, and since I sell luxury bags for a living- I always check out the local . In fact, I will go out of my way to drop into if I’m in the area.

So, I thought I’d give you a little test- to see if you can guess where I am in pictures with the that I visit. This is from a trip in May 2007.

I’ll give you three clues!

  1. That’s me below-on the right, with my sister in law on the left and a great friend in the middle…

  2. That’s me below…with DH. Sorry for the scowl! The sun was really in my eyes!

  3. If you don’t have it from those clues… this one should give it to you!

This Louis Vuitton red epi Montsouris backpack was made to celebrate the 700th year of the reign of the Grimaldi family. It has really fantastic embossing on the back of a crown, with the name of this wonderful little country (the second smallest independant nation in the world) with the dates 1297-1997. It also has the crown on the pocket zipper pull!

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!