Browse our Items on

View in-Store Items

Posts Tagged ‘Peter Gronquist’

Done to Death

Monday, September 8th, 2008

Uh… yeah.  So bizarre.  Not the concept of using the Louis Vuitton trademark logos on automatic weapons- that’s been done to death.  What’s bizarre to me, is how similar the “new” Justin Melnick “ARM ME” exhibition is in comparison with Peter Gronquiest’s The Revolution will be Fabulous- A Weapons of Mass Designer Show in LA just a couple months ago.  I mean, is it possible that Justin’s “images” are pictures of Peter’s work?  Take a look:

From Justin’s exhibition:

Arm Me Louis Vuitton

From Peter’s:

Peter Gronquist Louis Vuitton

The fact is that the whole thing bugs me on several levels.

First, it’s just not clever.  Sure, it’s disguised as clever, but it’s just not.  It’s the oldest, easiest trick in the book.  Use Louis Vuitton (and other luxury label’s good names) obviously without their permission and on something ugly and controversial.  Quick money.

Such a direct copy of an already lousy concept just demonstrates a lack of imagination.  It’s just not impressive at all- and again- actually is only remotely interesting considering the irony and the real battles that Louis Vuitton et. al wage with people copying them everyday.

Don’t get me wrong- I think Peter’s work is just as bad.  He’s clearly using illegally manufactured counterfeit scarves and unlicensed fabrics (you can see in closeups that these pieces aren’t painted- but use glued on fabric) to produce these “pieces of art” (and I use that phrase loosely).  All this does is perpetuate the very problem that both exhibitions are meant to make statements on.  Read articles on the connection between counterfeits and terrorism HERE and HERE.

Just my opinion.  And I can tell from all over the web, that there are a lot of folks out there impressed and entertained by Justin & Peter’s work.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

LV Doggie Bag

Tuesday, August 26th, 2008

 LV dog

Kanye just posted this little piece of art by Meryl Smith- a doggie bag, appropriated with the LV monogram… and I’ve gotta say it.  Regardless of the major yuck factor for this piece in particular, I’m so over the whole concept.

I mean, I get it.  Artists who want to make a statement “borrow” the LV marks because they are powerful and get noticed.  But it’s just lazy.  It’s been done to death.  (Think Nadia Plesner’s Darfur shirt, Wim Delvoye’s LV tatoo’d pigs, Peter Gronquist’s monogram Electric Chair (and chainsaw, glocks, artillary shells & Gazelle? of all things- etc. etc).

Louis Vuitton Dog

And I don’t know about you… but I think Louis Vuitton/ Marc Jacobs gets this.  So much so that maybe that’s part of the reason they brought Richard Prince on board.  You know, Richard Prince… “the Man who invented Appropriation”.

Louis Vuitton Monogram Doggie Bag

What do you think?

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

If Louis Vuitton hates the Darfur shirt, they’re gonna freak when they see the LV Electric Chair

Wednesday, May 7th, 2008

Peter Gronquist Louis Vuitton ELectric Chair
(Electric Chair listed at $4500: See the rest of the pics below…)

It seems like there is almost a movement of artists “appropriating” the Louis Vuitton logo in their work.

The thing is that IMO LVMH has two problems with the Darfur shirt:

  1. Who the heck wants to be connected to Darfur? LVMH, I’m sure doesn’t want any association with the atrocites going on over there.
  2. The bag that she’s pictured on her shirt is a fake: “confusingly similar” to a Louis Vuitton Murakami Multicolore. From the Cease and Desist letter that LVMH send Nadia Plesner:

“Although we applaud your efforts to raise awareness and funds to help Darfur, a most worthy cause, we cannot help noticing that the design of the Simple Living Products includes the reproduction of a bag infringing on Louis Vuitton’s Intellectual Property Rights, in particular the Louis Vuitton Monogram Multicolore Trademark to which it is confusingly similar. We are surprised of such a promotion of a counterfeit bag.”

 

Louis Vuitton Electric Chair

(Notice the Canal Street bracelets as cuffs)

So- now we’ve got Peter Gronquist’s blinged out, urban warfare gone Canal Street. I can’t imagine that Louis Vuitton would be pleased.

Louis Vuitton Chain Saw
(Chain Saw sold for $3250)

Gronquiest’s exhibition, “The Revolution will be Fabulous- A Weapons of Mass Designer Show” opened Friday night at Gallery 1988 in Los Angeles. This is I guess a commentary on not only commercialism, but the luxurization of everything. (Think Prada Phone, Chanel or Gucci Bicycle, Louis Vuitton Teddy Bear.)

He didn’t leave anyone out…. you’ll find rifles, artillery shells, granades, glocks, machine guns and for whatever reason- a Gazelle decked out in Louis Vuitton, Hermes, Chanel, Gucci, Fendi, Coach, Prada, Versace, Dior, D&G and Burberry.

Cherry Blossom gun
(listed at $3500)

Counterfeit scarf on LV gun
(Notice the tell-tale striping)

Gronquist used counterfeit scarves to cover these items, as is clear from the close-ups. (Louis Vuitton never made scarves with that striped effect, but they’re common in fakes.)

Cherry Blossom Scarf gun
(Again with the striped scarf- this one sold for $3500)

Louis Vuitton artillery shell LV Artillery Shell close up
(Artillery Shell- this one sold for $800)

Murakami Blinged out Glock
(Blinged out Multicolore Murakami)

Louis Vuitton Gazelle
(No comment on the LV antlered Gazelle)

Hmmm, wonder if Louis Vuitton’s gonna send Gronquist the same love letter that they sent Nadia?

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Bad Behavior has blocked 608 access attempts in the last 7 days.