Posts Tagged ‘Ruben Studdard’

Not exactly fan mail from Louis Vuitton

Monday, May 11th, 2009

Dear Editor:

We were dismayed to see the cover of the May 2009 issue of XXL Magazine, which features a photo of Rick Ross wearing a pair of sunglasses prominently featuring counterfeit Louis Vuitton trademarks. Because the photo has generated considerable confusion among your readers and Louis Vuitton customers among others, we feel it is important to clarify several points.

The first is that the sunglasses Mr. Ross is wearing were not made by Louis Vuitton, and in fact, are counterfeit. Louis Vuitton did not grant permission to Mr. Ross or to whoever did make the sunglasses to use our trademarks. The second is that no affiliation, sponsorship or association exists between Rick Ross or XXL and Louis Vuitton. The third is that counterfeiting is illegal.

Thank you for giving us the opportunity to correct the confusion.

Sincerely,

Michael D. Pantalony, Esq.
Louis Vuitton Malletier

We've said it before, unless what you're wearing is authentic... Louis Vuitton will come down on you.  Remember Ruben Studdard, Britney Spears, Jim Jones, Da Brat, Danity Kane (need I go on?)

Advice, getting the cover is cool... if you've got the opportunity for that kind of publicity and want to wear some killer shades... go to the Louis Vuitton boutique.  If you don't want to spend that kind of cash, come to Fashionphile for a sweet pair of authentic pre-owned Louis Vuitton, or Chanel etc. etc sunglasses for less than retail!

Jim Jones’ “Louie Vitton” Recording Studio

Wednesday, April 8th, 2009

Yikes... can't imagine Louis Vuitton's going to like this much. Especially after how they went after TI and his Rag. LV's really been coming down on the whole "unauthorized use" thing (think Britney, Ruben Studdard, Danity Kane, etc. etc.). With their trademarks being counterfeited left and right, they do their best to defend their intellectual property rights. Smart to keep the value of that name up.

I'm totally shocked that the Louis Vuitton monogram doesn't give Jim Jones flashbacks. He's found himself in a legal mess because he brawled Ne Yo in front of the Fifth Avenue Louis Vuitton boutique.

Source: NY Daily News

Louis Vuitton’s the “Show Stopper”

Friday, March 6th, 2009

Danity Kane LV seats

The show's over- at least for a couple Danity Kane video's, and songs in settlement of a dispute between Louis Vuitton and P. Diddy's Danity Kane.  Louis Vuitton won the settlement against Bad Boy Records over their use of LV trademarks in a couple of Danity Kane videos and song lyrics.

Like these ones, from DK's "Show Stopper" (the still pic above from the Show Stopper vid on their MySpace page):

"Bet you ain't never seen (hey)
Chicks ridin' this clean (hey)
Louis Vuitton seats (oh, oh, oh)
We do it deadly"

Danity Kane LV fanny pack

And this lovely fanny pack from their "Ride for You" video.

Louis Vuitton has always been protective of their trademark... for good reason, everyone wants a piece of it!  Remember Britney? Da Brat?  Ruben Studdard?  and the whole Sony BMG case?  And of course, who's NOT appropriating it?

Louis Vuitton's Intellectual Property Director, Nathalie Moulle-Berteaux made this statement in response to the settlement:

"We appreciate Warner Music Group’s and Bad Boy’s commitment to educate their artists about the importance of respecting our world renowned Toile Monogram and Multicolore marks, and their cooperation in protecting Louis Vuitton’s intellectual property. This worldwide agreement, combined with our previously announced agreement with Sony BMG in 2008, demonstrates our successful efforts throughout the music industry to defend our brand and intellectual property from unauthorized use, and to protect the best interest of our customers."

Notice the emphasis on unauthorized use...

Go team Louis!

Offensive and Unauthorized

Monday, January 5th, 2009

Islamic man Monogram Turban

Louis Vuitton does not like the unauthorized use of it's monogram... we've seen that for sure.  But they REALLY, REALLY don't like it when that use could be construed as potentially offensive and damaging to their reputation.

The picture above was included in Foreign Policy's article, "A World Without Islam", by Graham E. Fuller.  This is the response from Louis Vuitton that came out in the January/February 2009 issue on FP's use of the Monogram.

"The article “A World Without Islam” (January/February 2008) included a reproduction of our historic and highly recognizable registered trademark, the Louis Vuitton Monogram Pattern, without our authorization. Such use could lead your readers to the mistaken impression that Louis Vuitton Malletier was involved in some way in its publication. The illustration, depicting a bearded man wearing a turban and robe featuring our trademark monogram, might be construed as offensive by people of the Islamic faith. Importantly, this use of our monogram design in an illustration could damage the long-established relationship we have carefully built with the Middle East and its people since the opening of our Louis Vuitton stores in the region.

—Michael Pantalony
Director of civil enforcement for North America
Louis Vuitton Malletier
New York, NY"

Remind anyone of the Mao Tse Tung Time Magazine pic?

LV’s Suite Life in St. Bart’s Villa

Wednesday, October 8th, 2008

Louis Vuitton Suite St. Barts

Check out the mosaic flooring outside and out in the "Louis Vuitton Master Suite" of this "Villa La Grande Maison des Etoiles" that just sold for a record breaking $39 Million!

Louis Vuitton bathroom, St. Barts

It's a 7 bedroom villa with not only serious ocean views, and several pools, but it has bedrooms designed in tribute to Louis Vuitton and Hermes.

Louis Vuitton has a policy against doing work like this... they don't do interior design or furniture.  As Patrick-Louis Vuitton, explained, “We are in the business of movement."  But, somehow, I don't think LVMH will mind.  They seem picky about who they let make unauthorized use of their logos, and who they don't.  (Think Kanye West and Ruben Studdard's monogram CD cases.  Both unauthorized (KW's was years before he began working closely with LV) but only Studdard got sued.)

Louis Vuitton doesn’t play that game

Saturday, September 6th, 2008

 Fake for Real LV

I mean... when will people learn.  Louis Vuitton REALLY doesn't like it when people use their marks without their permission.

So there's this kind of clever game out there called Fakes for Real.  It includes 60 cards and is a "Memory" style game where you match up pairs.  But, instead of being matched sets of two- there is a real card matched with its fake.  So... the real Mona Lisa and a repro,  Bavaria’s Neuschwanstein castle and Sleeping Beauty's Disneyland castle, the Villa Rotonda and its look-a-like "the White House", an aerial picture of downtown Toronto and one from the computer game The Sims.  I actually really like the concept!

However, the box and packaging are clearly inspired by the Louis Vuitton trademark logo pointed quatrefoils as well as the overall multicolore dress.

Fake for Real ribbon

It's temporarily offline- and here's what the www.fakeforreal.com website looks like right now:

Fake For real website

Ha!  I totally LOVE what they did to most of the offending marks game in that pic:

Fake for Real LV

Anyway... I mean, I get it.  A game of fakes and they're using the logos of the most historically faked brand satirically.  But that's just the problem.   Louis Vuitton doesn't want to be associated with anything counterfeit... let alone a game of fakes.  (And quite frankly, they are vigilant in quashing the unauthorized use of their marks at all.  Remember Britney, Ruben Studdard, Da Brat, BMG and the infamous Darfur shirt?)

Here's an interesting read about it.

Well, that settles it…

Saturday, August 2nd, 2008

 Britney Spears Fakey Louis Vuitton Pink Hummer

Remember the Sony BMG case from last year- where Louis Vuitton sued for unauthorized use of their trademark?  Well, it looks like the case was settled for an undisclosed sum.  Rumors put it at $240,000 and $155,830 for both cases.

It was over quite a few issues, including the Britney Spears video "Do Somethin'", pictured above, where she's driving the Pink Hummer with fakey cherry blossom interior, Ruben Studdard's Louis Vuitton monogramed cover for his "The Return" CD, and a video of Da Brat's where there are just a bunch of different LV pieces pictured that Louis Vuitton never did (beach umbrella? Multicolore Beach Ball?  etc. etc.)

Da Brat Louis Vuitton

This comment from Crains made total sense to me:

"Sony’s case against Louis Vuitton was likely damaged by the fact that the artists did not use genuine LVMH products in the infractions, said Peter Sloane, an attorney at Ostrolenk Faber LLP who specializes in trademarks and copyrights. In the case of Ms. Spears, Louis Vuitton does not make dashboard covers or even sell reams of logo fabric that could be fashioned as such."

Ruben Studdard

I mean, this is just true.  I've seen album covers with authentic Louis Vuitton luggage on it (Dwight Yoakam anyone) and music videos that include authentic Louis Vuitton pieces in them (numerous including Fergie's classic, My Humps).  I mean, Kanye West declared himself the Louis Vuitton Don- and LVMH's response?  He's now designing a footware line for Louis Vuitton, sits front row at LV fashion shows & is paid big bucks to play for their parties.  Even Louis Vuitton likes the right kind of exposure.  The real key is, at the very least- the items have to be authentic.

Part of the terms of the settlement are that Ruben's CD's are pulled- and that Britney and Da Brat's videos are no longer distributed.  I mean, it's too bad, but I really can not believe that these people have professional managers and advisors, and none of were told that this would be wrong.

I love the little note at the bottom of this New Yorker Magazine article that says,

"In fact, according to our calculations, with the total winnings minus the Studdard bonus, the company can buy itself, why, 130 airport rolling bags!" (The Louis Vuitton retails at between about $1900 and $2995)

But it clearly wasn't about the money.  Another part of the settlement required the parties to admit they were wrong, and to refrain from violating Louis Vuitton's intellectual property rights.

From, Marketwatch:

"Nathalie Moulle-Berteaux, Intellectual Property Director of Louis Vuitton said, 'We are very pleased to have successfully resolved these matters in a manner that protects our brand and our customers. We believe the terms of this agreement will provide strong protection to our brand worldwide, and we are gratified that Sony BMG has agreed to educate its record labels about our trademarks and copyrights in order to prevent the misuse of our intellectual property in the future.'"

Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).

Bad Behavior has blocked 1871 access attempts in the last 7 days.